| Film Review | Dana Place |
Garfield:
A Tail of Two Kitties (2006)
Jennifer Love Hewitt
Breckin Meyer
Bill Murray
Lucy Davis
Billy Connolly
Directed by Tim Hill
With a plotline derivative of Mark Twain’s “The Prince and
the Pauper”, this sequel to the original film knows exactly
who saw the original and where their core audience lies,
5-10 year olds. The death of an English noblewoman and the
subsequent willing of her entire estate to her cat (who is
the spitting image of Garfield) leaves her nephew, Dargis
(Billy Connoly), furious. Determined to take control of her
estate, he hatches a plan to get rid of the cat. Meanwhile,
Jon Arbuckle (Meyer) learns that the woman he loves, Liz
(Hewitt), is leaving the country for a symposium in England.
Jon decides to meet his ladylove in England and surprise
her. Garfield and Odie hitch a ride to make sure Jon doesn’t
make a complete fool out of himself, and in case you haven’t
figured it out yet, through a comedy of errors, Garfield
ends up being mistaken for the English cat, and has to stop
Dargis’ plot before he is killed. All the while keeping
track of his hapless owner.
This film makes prefect sense as a sequel. You have already
made one film with Garfield, what could be better? Two
Garfields. Give one an English accent and a barnyard full of
talking friends and you are ready to go. You really don’t
need an engaging plot, realistic dialogue or passable acting
when you are trying to appeal to young children, at least
that seemed to be the thinking of the producers of this
film, because everything in the film except the animals
seemed pretty inconsequential. Just show Garfield jumping
into a few pans of lasagna and pushing Odie off the couch
and you have a kid’s movie.
While the highlight of a mostly dismal film was certainly
the big orange cat (having been a fan of Garfield as a child
and not seeing the original film I did get a kick out of
seeing him brought to life), whenever Garfield wasn’t on
screen we were left with a film that really didn’t have much
to offer at all and my thrill at seeing Garfield jump around
could have just as easily been fulfilled with a 30 second
clip of Garfield smarting off to Jon on Youtube.
I understand that this film wasn’t made for adults and isn’t
expected to be on a lot of critics top ten lists of the
year, but sitting in a theater full of children, I noticed
something that speaks more to the film than I ever could. A
little more than half way through the film, the children
started shifting in their seats. Most of them seemed bored,
and with the exception of a few one-liners chuckles, the
theater was very quiet. The only thing I could take out of
that was that maybe in an age of Pixar/Disney/Dreamworks
films designed to please children and adults, it takes more
than an orange cat jumping around with a few talking
barnyard animals. To paraphrase an old TV commercial: “Give
it to Mikey, he’ll eat anything.” Well, I don’t even think
Mikey would eat this one.
Film Review Index

